[graph-tool] mcmc_equilibrate - Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Tiago de Paula Peixoto tiago at skewed.de
Tue Feb 21 12:07:43 CET 2017

On 21.02.2017 10:54, P-M wrote:
> Thank you for that clarification. I presume that I should not be using it to
> calculate the likelihood of missing edges then?

Not if you want the probabilities to be correct; though they might still be
approximately correct.

> From what I gather implementing parallel MCDM is not straightforward (though
> my knowledge of this is hazy). Is it on your list of future developments at
> all? Or will this section of graph-tool stay large non-parallel for now?

I don't think it is trivial to write a fully parallel code, since the model
likelihood depends on the global state. So, threads that read it and modify
it need to synchronize.

Tiago de Paula Peixoto <tiago at skewed.de>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.skewed.de/pipermail/graph-tool/attachments/20170221/c1d0d9a8/attachment.asc>

More information about the graph-tool mailing list