[graph-tool] Effect of hubs in WSBM

Dominik Schlechtweg dominik.schlechtweg at gmx.de
Fri Jul 17 20:55:02 CEST 2020


Am 17.07.20 um 20:44 schrieb Tiago de Paula Peixoto:
> Am 17.07.20 um 20:35 schrieb Dominik Schlechtweg:> Thanks for clarifying
> this. Last question: Does your doubt also
>> concern the special case where alpha = 0, i.e., ignoring edge
>> probabilities completely? (This is the actually interesting case for
>> us. We are not interested in tuning this parameter in any way.)
> 
> I'd have to look at this more closely, but I think this is strange since
> the edges define the support of the distribution. The more correct thing
> to do, in my opinion, would be to marginalize over the edges. This might
> end up being equivalent o setting alpha=0, but I would need to check.

You're probably quite busy, but as we would really profit from this, I would then open a feature request, if you don't stop me right now. :-)

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> graph-tool mailing list
> graph-tool at skewed.de
> https://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x67336E43281F46CA.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 677 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.skewed.de/pipermail/graph-tool/attachments/20200717/fec2bb07/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.skewed.de/pipermail/graph-tool/attachments/20200717/fec2bb07/attachment.asc>


More information about the graph-tool mailing list